LawMirror.com

Results of o 3 r 4

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 81-89 of 89 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1986
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 4, 3 -- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Should be decided merely on affidavits in shortest possible time - Such matters not to be strictly decided like rights of parties in main suit - Parties should be allowed to contest their claims on merits instead of dismissing suit by refusing to restore it - Suit if dismissed in..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1977
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 4 -- Counsel entering into compromise - Counsel duly appointed -Compromise decree when binding on client - Absence of appellant on the date when the compromise was entered to instruct his lawyer is a slender ground to assail the decree unless lack of bonafide on the part of the lawyer is itself established. O.3.R.4 CPC enjoins a..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1975
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 4 -- Advocates - authority to compromise has implied authority unless it has been taken away by the express terms in the power of attorney...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1975
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 4 -- Without vakalatnama or memo of appearance, Advocate is not entitled to plead or act on behalf of that party...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1975
Details

Punjab Co-operative Societies Rules, 1963, Rule 3, 4, 5, 23 -- Zones and Zonal lists of voters - Must be exhibited as required by Rules - Notices if not properly exhibited - Not possible for persons concerned to know about Zones and voters to raise objections - Notices should be exhibited 6 clear days before the date of filing objections.
A reading of Rules 3 and 4 of..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1975
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 4 -- A pleader has no authority to revoke the appointment of an Arbitrator or arbitrators made by his party without instructions from and to appoint a new Arbitrator in substitution...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1974
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 4 -- Advocates - Power to compromise - Authority should be specified and express power how to be exercised indicated...........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1973
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 4 -- Leave granting client to engage another Advocate in the pending cases only on the payment of the full fee agreed upon for the entire case - A client has the opportunity to change his counsel during the pendency of a case and is entitled to leave of the Court to do so. But that leave will be subject to the condition that he..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1972
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 4 -- Counsel's power to compromise - Even if not conferred by power - of - attorney - Advocate in India has got general powers to compromise - Client if does not want to give power to compromise to his counsel - Must specifically issue instructions to that effect Even if the power to compromise has not been conferred by the..........

Showing : 81-89 of 89 Results