LawMirror.com

Results of trade+marks+act

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 81-90 of 591 Results

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 35A, Order 13A, Rule 3 -- Compensatory cost - Suit for infringement of Trade mark - Application for summary judgment - Defendants have no real prospect of successfully defending claim - They notwithstanding their stated position have compelled plaintiff to pursue the matter by taking application for summary judgment - Suit carried over a..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 21, 65, 85, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 18A, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439 -- Recovery of prohibited drugs without valid licence - Bail - Accused not fit to be kept in jail for indefinite period - Accused suffering from heart disease and his blood sugar is uncontrolled and is required to..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 137 -- Infringement of trade mark - Passing off - It is in essence an action based on deceit, fraud is not a necessary element of a right of action and that defendant's state of mind is wholly irrelevant to existence of a cause of action for passing off, if otherwise defendant has imitated or adopted plaintiff's mark...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 137 -- Infringement of trade mark - Passing off - Substitution of letter `T' for letter `O' is the only difference between two trade names - Plaintiff clearly a prior user would make it clear that first pre-requisite for action in passing off was made out - Division Bench granted interim injunction and stay order - Such stay was continued..........

TRIPURA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 37, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439 -- Recovery of 93.900 kg cannabis - Bail - Secret information - Accused found involved in illicit trade of NDPS - Due compliance of provision of S.42 of the Act made out - Independent witnesses joined the search and seizure process - Twin tests as enumerated in S.37..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 2(zb) -- Trade mark - Exclusive use - Plaintiff is registered owner of label mark in Class-30 of Classification of goods and services - In said registration there is a disclaimer for word `MALABAR' - Plaintiff though claims exclusive right over word `MALABAR' since there is a disclaimer to exclusive use of word `MALABAR', he has no right over..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 135, 2(zb) -- Infringement of Trade mark - Plaintiff selling Biryani Rice with word `MALABAR' and also modified label mark of defendant - Label of defendant containing words `BAROMA', `MALABAR', `GOLD' are circled having a different get up from that of plaintiff - By comparison of two label marks, both appear to be substantially different -..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 11 -- Res judicata - Infringement of Trade Mark - Issues between parties already stand decided by Judgment of Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) - Said judgment became final being not challenged by either of defendants - Therefore, by applying the spirit of provision of S.11 Explanation I CPC and accepting the finality of..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Punjab Excise Act, 1913, Section 61, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 465, 468, 471, Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 103, 104 -- Bail - Offence u/s 420, 465, 468, 471 IPC, s.61 of Punjab Excise Act and Ss.103, 104 Trademark Act - FSL report has not been received - Offence is triable by Magistrate and only challan has been..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962, Section 3(1)(b), 2(b), 6(2) -- Parole - For 6 weeks to meet his family - Apprehension shown by respondents that petitioner is convicted in a case registered under NDPS Act and on his release will again indulge in same trade - Said apprehension is not per se of his causing danger to security of State and..........

Showing : 81-90 of 591 Results