LawMirror.com

Results of civil+application

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 951-960 of 32588 Results

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 498A, 34, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Section 4, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Offence u/Ss. 498-A, 34 IPC and 4 DP Act - Quashing of complaint - General allegations - Complainant apart from making bald allegation that co-accused were acting at behest of accused 4, failed to provide any material to connect Accused 4 with..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Prima facie case in favour of plaintiff not challenged so High Court not entering into issue of prima facie case - Balance of convenience lies in favour of defendant and it would be defendant who would be facing comparative more hardship and irreparable loss, if temporary injunction is granted -..........

TELANGANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 9 -- Appointment of Advocate Commissioner - Advocate Commissioner can be appointed in a suit for perpetual injunction only where there is a serious dispute pertaining to boundaries or identity of property...........

TELANGANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 18, Rule 17 -- Recall of PW1 for marking documents and reopening of evidence of PW1 - Suit was already pending consideration for almost 15 years - PW1's evidence was recorded almost a decade back - During all this time when suit was pending before Trial Court, petitioner never thought of getting these documents marked -..........

TELANGANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of plaint - Amendments can be refused where other party cannot be placed in the same position as if pleading had been originally correct, but amendment would cause him an injury which could not be compensated in costs and power to allow an amendment is wide and may at any stage be appropriately exercised in the..........

TELANGANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of plaint - Amendment sought does not alter the nature of suit - Issues in main suit are yet to be framed and suit was at the stage of filing written statement - Allowing amendment even before filing of written statement would not have any adverse effect on defence set up by defendants - Application rightly allowed...........

MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 2A -- Interim injunction - Disobedience - Infringement of trade mark - Appellant tendered apology for infringement and stated that same had occurred due to a bona fide mistake and had not been sold directly by Company but through some agents prior to injunction order - Though there was no clear finding of lower Court as to willful..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Condonation of delay - Defendant has not only failed to show sufficient cause for his prolonged absence before trial Court but has also approached High Court after exhausting two rounds of adjudication both trial Court and revisional Court having concurrently..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of pleadings - At the stage of consideration of application for amendment in pleading, merits of proposed amendment are not required to be delved into - More liberal approach is warranted where defendant seeks amendment in written statement as potentiality of prejudice to plaintiff is relatively less - Defendant is..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of pleadings - Mere delay in seeking amendment in pleading by itself, cannot be sole ground on which application for amendment can be rejected - However, where O.6.R.17 proviso CPC comes into play, jurisdictional fact needs to be satisfied...........

Showing : 951-960 of 32588 Results