LawMirror.com

Results of consumer

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 971-980 of 4821 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 16(1) -- Appointment of member of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission - Samiti member challenging appointment - Nothing on record to suggest as to how appointment of appellant would adversely affect members of Samiti - His position was nothing more than that of a meddlesome interloper/busy body - Petition, held, not..........

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A -- Limitation - Insurance claim - Marine Cargo air Cover - Parcel of diamonds sent by air failed to reach destination - Cause of action arose on or before 24.5.1999 - The consumer complaint filed on 19.8.2006 without any application for condonation of delay - The consumer complaint ought to have been dismissed being barred by..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b) -- Consumer Protection Regulations, 2005, Regulation 14 - Revision - Condonation of delay - Delay of 49 days in filing revision petition on ground of illness of petitioner - Application for condonation of delay prepared casually - Apart from there being no supporting material such as the prescription of a doctor or description..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Haryana Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 2002, Chapter 5, para 5.1.(c) - Date of birth certificate - Delay in issue - Mala fide - Alleged mala fide intention on the part of respondent - Held that for such allegation the remedy lies elsewhere...........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(b), 2(1)(d)(ii) -- Complainant - Consumer - Complaint maintainability - Complaint filed by petitioner the father on behalf of his 29 years old major son without any power of attorney or authorization from his son, whose birth certificate is subject matter of complaint, held no maintainable...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 16(1), 16(1A) -- Kerala Consumer Protection Rules, 2005, Rule 17(1) - Appointment - Members State Consumer Redressal Forum - It is required to be made by the State Government on the recommendation of the Selection Committee - In the event of disagreement on the candidature of any particular person between the Chairman and/or the..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226 -- Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Sections 16(1), 16(1A) - Kerala Consumer Protection Rules, 2005, Rule 17(1) - Writ jurisdiction - Quo warranto - Locus standi - Appointment - Members State Consumer Redressal Forum - Respondent No.1 who had nothing to do with the appointment of the members of the State Commission did not place any..........

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d) -- Deposit - Non - refund - Unfair trade practice - Compensation - No cogent evidence produced before the District Forum that appellant was in any manner responsible for the conduct of the business of either of these companies arrayed in the complaint case or would be liable to the misdeeds of other Directors or..........

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 25(3), 27 -- Execution proceedings - Refund of deposit - Interest - Contentions of the complainant for enhancement of rate of interest or altering mode from simple to compound interest - Executing Court cannot go behind the decree - Since the original order was not challenged by the complainant at appropriate stage, and execution..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- UCO Bank Employees Provident Fund Rules, Rule 18 - Provident fund - Non release of - As per Rule 18, if a contributor is dismissed for fraud or misconduct, the Bank apart from not releasing their part of the contribution is required to declare the amount of loss or damage and is entitled to recover it from the contribution..........

Showing : 971-980 of 4821 Results